What does this Managers ranking show?

This ranking shows WA suburbs with the highest Managers worker counts, based on Census 2021 demographic data.

Should I choose a suburb just because it ranks highly here?

No. Demographic rankings explain local context, not investment quality by themselves. Use them with price, rent, income, schools, transport, and detail-page evidence before shortlisting.

Why does QuickProperty show count and percentage of population?

The count shows the size of the local group, while the percentage helps avoid overreading large suburbs that rank highly only because they have more residents overall.

What is the next step after this demographic ranking?

Open the suburb detail pages for the strongest candidates, save realistic matches to your shortlist, and compare them against affordability and local evidence before making a decision.

← Managers

Occupation · WA · 100 suburbs

Top Suburbs by Managers Workers — WA

WA suburbs with the highest number of Managers managers workers, ranked by count from Census 2021.

Top suburb

Canning ValeWA

Leading count

2,007

% of population

5.8%

Source

ABS Census 2021

Ranking

Top Suburbs by Managers Workers

WA suburbs with the highest number of Managers managers workers, ranked by count from Census 2021. — WA

100 results

All NSW VIC QLD WA SA TAS ACT NT

How to read this ranking

Use top suburbs by managers workers to find workforce clusters, not finished shortlists.

BEST FOR

Finding suburbs with a strong concentration of one worker group.

This is useful when you want to see where a profession or worker cohort is clustered in WA.

READ IT AS

A scale signal, not a suburb score.

Worker counts reflect concentration and population scale. They should be read alongside housing costs, incomes, and access, not in isolation.

NEXT STEP

Validate whether the cluster actually fits your goal.

Move into suburb detail if you need to judge whether the area is investable, livable, or simply large enough to dominate a count-based list.

AVAILABLE evidence

Census concentration signal

This ranking is backed by demographic counts. It is good for finding clusters, not for deciding suburb quality alone.

CLUSTER SCREEN

This ranking finds concentration, not suburb quality.

Use top rows as research leads, then test affordability, services, and evidence depth before shortlisting.

Shortlist flow

Use #1 Canning Vale and #2 Baldivis as the first compare pair.

Rankings are strongest when they hand you a shortlist quickly. Compare the top two first, then open suburb detail if the head-to-head result still feels narrow.

Compare top 2Open #1 detail Open #2 detail

# ▲	SUBURB	STATE	COUNT	% OF POP	POP
1	Canning Vale	WA	2,007	34,504	5.8%
2	Baldivis	WA	1,882	37,697	5.0%
3	Scarborough	WA	1,586	17,605	9.0%
4	Dianella	WA	1,530	24,169	6.3%
5	Duncraig	WA	1,244	15,982	7.8%
6	Bayswater	WA	1,197	15,288	7.8%
7	Perth	WA	1,163	13,670	8.5%
8	South Perth	WA	1,149	12,596	9.1%
9	Como	WA	1,113	14,786	7.5%
10	Hillarys	WA	1,090	11,200	9.7%
11	Mount Lawley	WA	1,089	11,328	9.6%
12	East Perth	WA	1,075	11,681	9.2%
13	Morley	WA	1,070	22,539	4.7%
14	Ellenbrook	WA	1,059	24,668	4.3%
15	Landsdale	WA	992	15,401	6.4%
16	Willetton	WA	985	19,262	5.1%
17	Maylands	WA	984	13,199	7.5%
18	Wembley	WA	949	12,061	7.9%
19	North Perth	WA	911	9,623	9.5%
20	Floreat	WA	906	8,621	10.5%
21	Subiaco	WA	893	9,940	9.0%
22	Nedlands	WA	873	10,561	8.3%
23	Thornlie	WA	861	23,665	3.6%
24	Karrinyup	WA	845	9,886	8.5%
25	Yokine	WA	843	12,706	6.6%
26	Mosman Park	WA	836	9,169	9.1%
27	Piara Waters	WA	822	15,029	5.5%
28	Mount Hawthorn	WA	819	8,183	10.0%
29	Doubleview	WA	816	9,205	8.9%
30	Stirling	WA	815	10,165	8.0%
31	Ballajura	WA	811	18,459	4.4%
32	Byford	WA	810	18,878	4.3%
33	Claremont	WA	808	9,248	8.7%
34	Aveley	WA	801	13,998	5.7%
35	Cottesloe	WA	801	7,750	10.3%
36	Kingsley	WA	801	13,204	6.1%
37	East Victoria Park	WA	782	10,569	7.4%
38	East Fremantle	WA	772	7,819	9.9%
39	Secret Harbour	WA	768	12,474	6.2%
40	Southern River	WA	762	12,852	5.9%
41	Leeming	WA	750	10,883	6.9%
42	Fremantle	WA	740	9,251	8.0%
43	Applecross	WA	736	7,228	10.2%
44	Bassendean	WA	731	10,837	6.7%
45	City Beach	WA	718	6,805	10.6%
46	Rivervale	WA	714	10,897	6.6%
47	Mount Pleasant	WA	713	7,456	9.6%
48	Sorrento	WA	711	7,795	9.1%
49	Woodvale	WA	711	9,579	7.4%
50	Halls Head	WA	695	14,474	4.8%
51	Harrisdale	WA	683	11,667	5.9%
52	Success	WA	664	11,340	5.9%
53	Wembley Downs	WA	659	6,743	9.8%
54	Innaloo	WA	653	9,592	6.8%
55	Mindarie	WA	653	7,867	8.3%
56	Attadale	WA	651	6,638	9.8%
57	Ocean Reef	WA	651	8,125	8.0%
58	Victoria Park	WA	648	9,334	6.9%
59	Clarkson	WA	642	13,904	4.6%
60	Bicton	WA	640	6,961	9.2%
61	Rockingham	WA	635	15,312	4.1%
62	Wellard	WA	618	14,127	4.4%
63	Atwell	WA	617	9,287	6.6%
64	Carine	WA	614	7,330	8.4%
65	Wanneroo	WA	610	12,113	5.0%
66	Australind	WA	602	15,988	3.8%
67	Balcatta	WA	602	10,813	5.6%
68	Kardinya	WA	590	9,137	6.5%
69	Margaret River	WA	590	8,918	6.6%
70	Tapping	WA	589	9,547	6.2%
71	Greenwood	WA	582	9,861	5.9%
72	Forrestfield	WA	580	13,181	4.4%
73	Palmyra	WA	579	7,585	7.6%
74	Hamilton Hill	WA	576	11,327	5.1%
75	Nollamara	WA	575	12,779	4.5%
76	Butler	WA	572	13,473	4.2%
77	High Wycombe	WA	572	12,198	4.7%
78	Iluka	WA	563	5,669	9.9%
79	Melville	WA	553	6,204	8.9%
80	Spearwood	WA	552	10,944	5.0%
81	Lesmurdie	WA	546	8,413	6.5%
82	Port Kennedy	WA	542	13,477	4.0%
83	Padbury	WA	532	8,626	6.2%
84	Roleystone	WA	528	6,848	7.7%
85	Alkimos	WA	527	10,203	5.2%
86	Inglewood	WA	518	5,837	8.9%
87	West Perth	WA	518	6,102	8.5%
88	Beeliar	WA	512	8,617	5.9%
89	Quinns Rocks	WA	509	8,861	5.7%
90	Joondalup	WA	506	9,193	5.5%
91	Gosnells	WA	505	21,149	2.4%
92	Banksia Grove	WA	501	11,351	4.4%
93	Kalamunda	WA	501	7,163	7.0%
94	Madeley	WA	501	6,805	7.4%
95	Swanbourne	WA	498	4,592	10.8%
96	The Vines	WA	495	5,848	8.5%
97	Mount Claremont	WA	485	4,999	9.7%
98	Darch	WA	482	7,347	6.6%
99	Waikiki	WA	473	12,453	3.8%
100	Mullaloo	WA	469	6,190	7.6%

FAQ

Top Suburbs by Managers Workers FAQ

What does this Managers ranking show?

This ranking shows WA suburbs with the highest Managers worker counts, based on Census 2021 demographic data.
Should I choose a suburb just because it ranks highly here?

No. Demographic rankings explain local context, not investment quality by themselves. Use them with price, rent, income, schools, transport, and detail-page evidence before shortlisting.
Why does QuickProperty show count and percentage of population?

The count shows the size of the local group, while the percentage helps avoid overreading large suburbs that rank highly only because they have more residents overall.
What is the next step after this demographic ranking?

Open the suburb detail pages for the strongest candidates, save realistic matches to your shortlist, and compare them against affordability and local evidence before making a decision.