What does this Managers ranking show?

This ranking shows ACT suburbs with the highest Managers worker counts, based on Census 2021 demographic data.

Should I choose a suburb just because it ranks highly here?

No. Demographic rankings explain local context, not investment quality by themselves. Use them with price, rent, income, schools, transport, and detail-page evidence before shortlisting.

Why does QuickProperty show count and percentage of population?

The count shows the size of the local group, while the percentage helps avoid overreading large suburbs that rank highly only because they have more residents overall.

What is the next step after this demographic ranking?

Open the suburb detail pages for the strongest candidates, save realistic matches to your shortlist, and compare them against affordability and local evidence before making a decision.

← Managers

Occupation · ACT · 100 suburbs

Top Suburbs by Managers Workers — ACT

ACT suburbs with the highest number of Managers managers workers, ranked by count from Census 2021.

Top suburb

CampbellACT

Leading count

1,729

% of population

26.3%

Source

ABS Census 2021

Ranking

Top Suburbs by Managers Workers

ACT suburbs with the highest number of Managers managers workers, ranked by count from Census 2021. — ACT

100 results

All NSW VIC QLD WA SA TAS ACT NT

How to read this ranking

Use top suburbs by managers workers to find workforce clusters, not finished shortlists.

BEST FOR

Finding suburbs with a strong concentration of one worker group.

This is useful when you want to see where a profession or worker cohort is clustered in ACT.

READ IT AS

A scale signal, not a suburb score.

Worker counts reflect concentration and population scale. They should be read alongside housing costs, incomes, and access, not in isolation.

NEXT STEP

Validate whether the cluster actually fits your goal.

Move into suburb detail if you need to judge whether the area is investable, livable, or simply large enough to dominate a count-based list.

AVAILABLE evidence

Census concentration signal

This ranking is backed by demographic counts. It is good for finding clusters, not for deciding suburb quality alone.

CLUSTER SCREEN

This ranking finds concentration, not suburb quality.

Use top rows as research leads, then test affordability, services, and evidence depth before shortlisting.

Shortlist flow

Use #1 Campbell and #2 Kambah as the first compare pair.

Rankings are strongest when they hand you a shortlist quickly. Compare the top two first, then open suburb detail if the head-to-head result still feels narrow.

Compare top 2Open #1 detail Open #2 detail

# ▲	SUBURB	STATE	COUNT	% OF POP	POP
1	Campbell	ACT	1,729	6,564	26.3%
2	Kambah	ACT	1,221	15,670	7.8%
3	Kingston	ACT	1,112	6,579	16.9%
4	Braddon	ACT	971	6,383	15.2%
5	Harrison	ACT	883	8,244	10.7%
6	Ngunnawal	ACT	883	10,957	8.1%
7	Watson	ACT	804	6,727	12.0%
8	Griffith	ACT	740	5,328	13.9%
9	Gungahlin	ACT	732	8,586	8.5%
10	Narrabundah	ACT	722	6,455	11.2%
11	Nicholls	ACT	718	6,680	10.7%
12	Franklin	ACT	688	7,484	9.2%
13	O'Connor	ACT	686	5,917	11.6%
14	Gordon	ACT	681	7,892	8.6%
15	Casey	ACT	661	6,471	10.2%
16	Kaleen	ACT	638	7,672	8.3%
17	Bruce	ACT	637	7,520	8.5%
18	Belconnen	ACT	629	8,502	7.4%
19	Wanniassa	ACT	627	7,885	8.0%
20	Amaroo	ACT	626	6,129	10.2%
21	Curtin	ACT	612	5,569	11.0%
22	Ainslie	ACT	610	5,376	11.3%
23	Dunlop	ACT	607	7,265	8.4%
24	Lyneham	ACT	606	5,703	10.6%
25	Turner	ACT	576	4,470	12.9%
26	Crace	ACT	561	4,800	11.7%
27	Forde	ACT	561	4,435	12.6%
28	Bonner	ACT	551	7,339	7.5%
29	Macgregor	ACT	549	7,049	7.8%
30	City	ACT	513	4,835	10.6%
31	Evatt	ACT	497	5,531	9.0%
32	Calwell	ACT	488	5,730	8.5%
33	Downer	ACT	475	4,296	11.1%
34	Phillip	ACT	473	5,197	9.1%
35	Coombs	ACT	466	4,851	9.6%
36	Palmerston	ACT	453	5,579	8.1%
37	Monash	ACT	450	5,644	8.0%
38	Conder	ACT	443	5,108	8.7%
39	Hackett	ACT	422	3,227	13.1%
40	Moncrieff	ACT	413	5,310	7.8%
41	Banks	ACT	407	5,100	8.0%
42	Dickson	ACT	405	3,292	12.3%
43	Farrer	ACT	402	3,787	10.6%
44	Weston	ACT	399	4,000	10.0%
45	Wright	ACT	396	3,808	10.4%
46	Chisholm	ACT	393	5,268	7.5%
47	Holt	ACT	393	5,628	7.0%
48	Red Hill	ACT	381	3,146	12.1%
49	Greenway	ACT	380	4,129	9.2%
50	Duffy	ACT	376	3,395	11.1%
51	Fadden	ACT	366	3,006	12.2%
52	Yarralumla	ACT	365	3,120	11.7%
53	Hughes	ACT	353	3,210	11.0%
54	Florey	ACT	348	4,781	7.3%
55	Deakin	ACT	342	3,124	10.9%
56	Theodore	ACT	338	3,798	8.9%
57	Garran	ACT	329	3,706	8.9%
58	Pearce	ACT	325	2,687	12.1%
59	Cook	ACT	322	2,965	10.9%
60	Denman Prospect	ACT	320	2,759	11.6%
61	Chapman	ACT	315	2,867	11.0%
62	Mawson	ACT	313	3,440	9.1%
63	Bonython	ACT	312	3,839	8.1%
64	Weetangera	ACT	309	2,795	11.1%
65	Barton	ACT	306	1,946	15.7%
66	Fisher	ACT	305	3,219	9.5%
67	Giralang	ACT	302	3,372	9.0%
68	Latham	ACT	302	3,767	8.0%
69	Melba	ACT	300	3,383	8.9%
70	Isabella Plains	ACT	299	4,329	6.9%
71	Flynn	ACT	297	3,671	8.1%
72	Gowrie	ACT	297	3,140	9.5%
73	Waramanga	ACT	295	2,785	10.6%
74	Aranda	ACT	294	2,605	11.3%
75	Hawker	ACT	292	3,008	9.7%
76	Holder	ACT	291	2,816	10.3%
77	Forrest	ACT	285	1,827	15.6%
78	Lyons	ACT	285	3,271	8.7%
79	Rivett	ACT	272	3,354	8.1%
80	Chifley	ACT	268	2,680	10.0%
81	Macquarie	ACT	265	3,104	8.5%
82	McKellar	ACT	265	2,740	9.7%
83	Higgins	ACT	247	3,321	7.4%
84	Lawson	ACT	244	2,739	8.9%
85	Torrens	ACT	234	2,424	9.7%
86	Scullin	ACT	233	3,069	7.6%
87	Isaacs	ACT	227	2,379	9.5%
88	Gilmore	ACT	217	2,706	8.0%
89	Spence	ACT	206	2,587	8.0%
90	Throsby	ACT	203	2,405	8.4%
91	Page	ACT	200	3,054	6.5%
92	Charnwood	ACT	181	3,055	5.9%
93	Stirling	ACT	181	2,191	8.3%
94	Fraser	ACT	178	2,126	8.4%
95	Reid	ACT	178	1,544	11.5%
96	Richardson	ACT	178	3,058	5.8%
97	Taylor	ACT	157	2,220	7.1%
98	Macarthur	ACT	145	1,405	10.3%
99	Oxley	ACT	130	1,703	7.6%
100	O'Malley	ACT	101	928	10.9%

FAQ

Top Suburbs by Managers Workers FAQ

What does this Managers ranking show?

This ranking shows ACT suburbs with the highest Managers worker counts, based on Census 2021 demographic data.
Should I choose a suburb just because it ranks highly here?

No. Demographic rankings explain local context, not investment quality by themselves. Use them with price, rent, income, schools, transport, and detail-page evidence before shortlisting.
Why does QuickProperty show count and percentage of population?

The count shows the size of the local group, while the percentage helps avoid overreading large suburbs that rank highly only because they have more residents overall.
What is the next step after this demographic ranking?

Open the suburb detail pages for the strongest candidates, save realistic matches to your shortlist, and compare them against affordability and local evidence before making a decision.