What does this Transport & Logistics ranking show?

This ranking shows WA suburbs with the highest Transport & Logistics worker counts, based on Census 2021 demographic data.

Should I choose a suburb just because it ranks highly here?

No. Demographic rankings explain local context, not investment quality by themselves. Use them with price, rent, income, schools, transport, and detail-page evidence before shortlisting.

Why does QuickProperty show count and percentage of population?

The count shows the size of the local group, while the percentage helps avoid overreading large suburbs that rank highly only because they have more residents overall.

What is the next step after this demographic ranking?

Open the suburb detail pages for the strongest candidates, save realistic matches to your shortlist, and compare them against affordability and local evidence before making a decision.

← Transport & Logistics

Industry · WA · 100 suburbs

Top Suburbs by Transport & Logistics Workers — WA

WA suburbs with the highest number of Transport & Logistics transport & logistics workers, ranked by count from Census 2021.

Top suburb

Canning ValeWA

Leading count

1,048

% of population

3.0%

Source

ABS Census 2021

Ranking

Top Suburbs by Transport & Logistics Workers

WA suburbs with the highest number of Transport & Logistics transport & logistics workers, ranked by count from Census 2021. — WA

100 results

All NSW VIC QLD WA SA TAS ACT NT

How to read this ranking

Use top suburbs by transport & logistics workers to locate employment clusters before deeper suburb work.

BEST FOR

Seeing where an industry has a visible local employment base.

This helps when you want a fast read on where one industry is concentrated in WA.

READ IT AS

A local employment footprint, not a full market verdict.

Employment counts say something about local economic shape, but they do not tell you on their own whether prices, rents, or amenities make the area attractive.

NEXT STEP

Cross-check with prices and household data.

Use the ranking to narrow the field, then verify affordability, demand, schools, and transport before treating the area as a serious candidate.

AVAILABLE evidence

Census concentration signal

This ranking is backed by demographic counts. It is good for finding clusters, not for deciding suburb quality alone.

CLUSTER SCREEN

This ranking finds concentration, not suburb quality.

Use top rows as research leads, then test affordability, services, and evidence depth before shortlisting.

Shortlist flow

Use #1 Canning Vale and #2 Thornlie as the first compare pair.

Rankings are strongest when they hand you a shortlist quickly. Compare the top two first, then open suburb detail if the head-to-head result still feels narrow.

Compare top 2Open #1 detail Open #2 detail

# ▲	SUBURB	STATE	COUNT	% OF POP	POP
1	Canning Vale	WA	1,048	34,504	3.0%
2	Thornlie	WA	786	23,665	3.3%
3	Ellenbrook	WA	759	24,668	3.1%
4	Gosnells	WA	679	21,149	3.2%
5	Byford	WA	649	18,878	3.4%
6	Morley	WA	624	22,539	2.8%
7	Forrestfield	WA	613	13,181	4.7%
8	High Wycombe	WA	600	12,198	4.9%
9	Piara Waters	WA	507	15,029	3.4%
10	Ballajura	WA	503	18,459	2.7%
11	South Hedland	WA	499	11,046	4.5%
12	Aveley	WA	469	13,998	3.4%
13	Balga	WA	469	13,864	3.4%
14	Maddington	WA	460	12,419	3.7%
15	Seville Grove	WA	410	11,408	3.6%
16	Harrisdale	WA	408	11,667	3.5%
17	Nollamara	WA	402	12,779	3.1%
18	Brabham	WA	382	8,665	4.4%
19	Armadale	WA	339	13,415	2.5%
20	Beckenham	WA	336	9,092	3.7%
21	Queens Park	WA	330	7,268	4.5%
22	Huntingdale	WA	326	9,021	3.6%
23	Cannington	WA	317	6,875	4.6%
24	Cloverdale	WA	305	8,864	3.4%
25	Spearwood	WA	301	10,944	2.8%
26	Bentley	WA	298	9,051	3.3%
27	Kelmscott	WA	294	10,575	2.8%
28	Kewdale	WA	288	7,397	3.9%
29	Port Hedland	WA	283	4,081	6.9%
30	East Cannington	WA	272	6,512	4.2%
31	Dayton	WA	270	5,507	4.9%
32	Marangaroo	WA	268	10,483	2.6%
33	Beechboro	WA	265	9,112	2.9%
34	Caversham	WA	258	7,419	3.5%
35	Wattle Grove	WA	251	6,547	3.8%
36	Swan View	WA	249	7,889	3.2%
37	Belmont	WA	245	6,959	3.5%
38	Bertram	WA	232	6,196	3.7%
39	Westminster	WA	217	7,042	3.1%
40	Maida Vale	WA	214	4,499	4.8%
41	Yangebup	WA	212	7,631	2.8%
42	Kenwick	WA	211	5,684	3.7%
43	Bennett Springs	WA	199	5,929	3.4%
44	South Lake	WA	193	5,831	3.3%
45	Mirrabooka	WA	186	8,000	2.3%
46	Wilson	WA	186	6,608	2.8%
47	Bullsbrook	WA	185	5,605	3.3%
48	Castletown	WA	183	3,968	4.6%
49	Langford	WA	182	5,505	3.3%
50	Cable Beach	WA	179	5,730	3.1%
51	Redcliffe	WA	176	5,030	3.5%
52	Girrawheen	WA	175	8,897	2.0%
53	Hilbert	WA	170	4,165	4.1%
54	Greenfields	WA	167	9,869	1.7%
55	Midland	WA	165	6,335	2.6%
56	Parmelia	WA	157	6,184	2.5%
57	South Guildford	WA	150	3,781	4.0%
58	Northam	WA	149	6,679	2.2%
59	Exmouth	WA	148	2,806	5.3%
60	Boulder	WA	145	4,872	3.0%
61	Kununurra	WA	144	5,494	2.6%
62	Camillo	WA	140	4,442	3.2%
63	Nickol	WA	139	4,938	2.8%
64	Baynton	WA	138	4,496	3.1%
65	Helena Valley	WA	133	4,130	3.2%
66	Wandina	WA	133	4,375	3.0%
67	Jane Brook	WA	128	3,670	3.5%
68	South Kalgoorlie	WA	126	4,416	2.9%
69	Somerville	WA	121	4,165	2.9%
70	Stratton	WA	121	3,267	3.7%
71	Djugun	WA	108	3,291	3.3%
72	Koondoola	WA	106	3,919	2.7%
73	Broome	WA	105	3,797	2.8%
74	Middle Swan	WA	101	2,852	3.5%
75	Bulgarra	WA	100	2,990	3.3%
76	Carey Park	WA	100	5,155	1.9%
77	Mount Tarcoola	WA	99	3,257	3.0%
78	Leda	WA	96	3,202	3.0%
79	Oakford	WA	96	2,803	3.4%
80	Lockridge	WA	92	3,322	2.8%
81	Merredin	WA	92	2,604	3.5%
82	Midvale	WA	88	2,283	3.9%
83	Mount Helena	WA	88	3,373	2.6%
84	Waggrakine	WA	87	2,679	3.2%
85	Mount Nasura	WA	86	2,997	2.9%
86	Haynes	WA	83	2,417	3.4%
87	Henley Brook	WA	81	2,500	3.2%
88	Erskine	WA	78	5,429	1.4%
89	Narrogin	WA	78	3,927	2.0%
90	Greenmount	WA	75	2,666	2.8%
91	Hannans	WA	73	2,410	3.0%
92	Pegs Creek	WA	73	2,050	3.6%
93	Brookdale	WA	72	2,968	2.4%
94	Esperance	WA	70	2,080	3.4%
95	Glendalough	WA	70	2,628	2.7%
96	Dampier	WA	69	1,282	5.4%
97	Serpentine	WA	69	2,863	2.4%
98	Woorree	WA	69	1,295	5.3%
99	West Beach	WA	68	1,483	4.6%
100	Geraldton	WA	67	3,246	2.1%

FAQ

Top Suburbs by Transport & Logistics Workers FAQ

What does this Transport & Logistics ranking show?

This ranking shows WA suburbs with the highest Transport & Logistics worker counts, based on Census 2021 demographic data.
Should I choose a suburb just because it ranks highly here?

No. Demographic rankings explain local context, not investment quality by themselves. Use them with price, rent, income, schools, transport, and detail-page evidence before shortlisting.
Why does QuickProperty show count and percentage of population?

The count shows the size of the local group, while the percentage helps avoid overreading large suburbs that rank highly only because they have more residents overall.
What is the next step after this demographic ranking?

Open the suburb detail pages for the strongest candidates, save realistic matches to your shortlist, and compare them against affordability and local evidence before making a decision.