Top Suburbs by Transport & Logistics Workers — SA
SA suburbs with the highest number of Transport & Logistics transport & logistics workers, ranked by count from Census 2021.
Top Suburbs by Transport & Logistics Workers
SA suburbs with the highest number of Transport & Logistics transport & logistics workers, ranked by count from Census 2021. — SA
This helps when you want a fast read on where one industry is concentrated in SA.
Employment counts say something about local economic shape, but they do not tell you on their own whether prices, rents, or amenities make the area attractive.
Use the ranking to narrow the field, then verify affordability, demand, schools, and transport before treating the area as a serious candidate.
This ranking is backed by demographic counts. It is good for finding clusters, not for deciding suburb quality alone.
Use top rows as research leads, then test affordability, services, and evidence depth before shortlisting.
Rankings are strongest when they hand you a shortlist quickly. Compare the top two first, then open suburb detail if the head-to-head result still feels narrow.
- 597#1ParalowieSA
- 573#2Parafield GardensSA
- 326#3SeatonSA
- 300#4Port LincolnSA
- 295#5Ingle FarmSA
- 278#6CraigmoreSA
- 270#7Salisbury NorthSA
- 269#8Andrews FarmSA
- 240#9BlakeviewSA
- 232#10FindonSA
- 230#11Munno Para WestSA
- 198#12SalisburySA
- 192#13Modbury HeightsSA
- 189#14North HavenSA
- 184#15Para HillsSA
- 184#16PoorakaSA
- 176#17Valley ViewSA
- 174#18Brooklyn ParkSA
- 173#19Hope ValleySA
- 163#20BurtonSA
- 162#21KilburnSA
- 149#22Blair AtholSA
- 140#23Salisbury DownsSA
- 138#24Angle ValeSA
- 138#25Port AugustaSA
- 134#26Munno ParaSA
- 131#27Largs NorthSA
- 130#28Salisbury HeightsSA
- 129#29HillbankSA
- 127#30NorthfieldSA
- 124#31ClearviewSA
- 124#32Gawler EastSA
- 124#33LewistonSA
- 121#34Davoren ParkSA
- 118#35Elizabeth DownsSA
- 115#36Camden ParkSA
- 115#37RichmondSA
- 114#38Ferryden ParkSA
- 110#39Royal ParkSA
- 108#40Port Augusta WestSA
- 107#41Two WellsSA
- 106#42HillcrestSA
- 106#43Holden HillSA
- 104#44RosewaterSA
- 103#45Evanston ParkSA
- 100#46West Lakes ShoreSA
- 99#47Elizabeth ParkSA
- 94#48Para Hills WestSA
- 92#49Elizabeth EastSA
- 91#50PenningtonSA
- 89#51VirginiaSA
- 87#52Woodville GardensSA
- 85#53TaperooSA
- 84#54Stirling NorthSA
- 83#55BordertownSA
- 81#56Brahma LodgeSA
- 81#57St MarysSA
- 80#58MorphettvilleSA
- 77#59WillastonSA
- 75#60FreelingSA
- 73#61Elizabeth NorthSA
- 73#62Elizabeth ValeSA
- 73#63OttowaySA
- 71#64CedunaSA
- 71#65Woodville NorthSA
- 70#66BalaklavaSA
- 70#67OsborneSA
- 70#68Para VistaSA
- 67#69BirkenheadSA
- 62#70BeverleySA
- 62#71CheltenhamSA
- 61#72Port Pirie SouthSA
- 61#73Smithfield PlainsSA
- 60#74Salisbury ParkSA
- 58#75Evanston GardensSA
- 58#76MannumSA
- 55#77AlbertonSA
- 55#78Athol ParkSA
- 54#79KadinaSA
- 54#80QueenstownSA
- 49#81Albert ParkSA
- 49#82Elizabeth SouthSA
- 47#83SmithfieldSA
- 46#84PeterheadSA
- 45#85West HindmarshSA
- 44#86EyreSA
- 44#87Salisbury PlainSA
- 40#88Reynella EastSA
- 39#89EtheltonSA
- 39#90Moonta BaySA
- 38#91CleveSA
- 38#92Elizabeth GroveSA
- 38#93Tailem BendSA
- 37#94TennysonSA
- 36#95Bedford ParkSA
- 36#96CowandillaSA
- 36#97MallalaSA
- 36#98Risdon Park SouthSA
- 35#99Angle ParkSA
- 35#100KeithSA
| # ▲ | SUBURB | STATE | COUNT | % OF POP | POP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paralowie | SA | 597 | 17,504 | 3.4% |
| 2 | Parafield Gardens | SA | 573 | 18,467 | 3.1% |
| 3 | Seaton | SA | 326 | 10,877 | 3.0% |
| 4 | Port Lincoln | SA | 300 | 14,458 | 2.1% |
| 5 | Ingle Farm | SA | 295 | 9,543 | 3.1% |
| 6 | Craigmore | SA | 278 | 10,943 | 2.5% |
| 7 | Salisbury North | SA | 270 | 10,683 | 2.5% |
| 8 | Andrews Farm | SA | 269 | 8,699 | 3.1% |
| 9 | Blakeview | SA | 240 | 8,979 | 2.7% |
| 10 | Findon | SA | 232 | 6,997 | 3.3% |
| 11 | Munno Para West | SA | 230 | 7,577 | 3.0% |
| 12 | Salisbury | SA | 198 | 8,841 | 2.2% |
| 13 | Modbury Heights | SA | 192 | 6,995 | 2.7% |
| 14 | North Haven | SA | 189 | 5,585 | 3.4% |
| 15 | Para Hills | SA | 184 | 6,793 | 2.7% |
| 16 | Pooraka | SA | 184 | 7,583 | 2.4% |
| 17 | Valley View | SA | 176 | 6,405 | 2.7% |
| 18 | Brooklyn Park | SA | 174 | 5,040 | 3.5% |
| 19 | Hope Valley | SA | 173 | 8,184 | 2.1% |
| 20 | Burton | SA | 163 | 6,519 | 2.5% |
| 21 | Kilburn | SA | 162 | 5,633 | 2.9% |
| 22 | Blair Athol | SA | 149 | 5,274 | 2.8% |
| 23 | Salisbury Downs | SA | 140 | 6,296 | 2.2% |
| 24 | Angle Vale | SA | 138 | 4,051 | 3.4% |
| 25 | Port Augusta | SA | 138 | 6,437 | 2.1% |
| 26 | Munno Para | SA | 134 | 4,719 | 2.8% |
| 27 | Largs North | SA | 131 | 4,005 | 3.3% |
| 28 | Salisbury Heights | SA | 130 | 4,488 | 2.9% |
| 29 | Hillbank | SA | 129 | 5,013 | 2.6% |
| 30 | Northfield | SA | 127 | 5,043 | 2.5% |
| 31 | Clearview | SA | 124 | 4,261 | 2.9% |
| 32 | Gawler East | SA | 124 | 5,689 | 2.2% |
| 33 | Lewiston | SA | 124 | 3,275 | 3.8% |
| 34 | Davoren Park | SA | 121 | 6,392 | 1.9% |
| 35 | Elizabeth Downs | SA | 118 | 5,160 | 2.3% |
| 36 | Camden Park | SA | 115 | 3,338 | 3.4% |
| 37 | Richmond | SA | 115 | 3,474 | 3.3% |
| 38 | Ferryden Park | SA | 114 | 4,495 | 2.5% |
| 39 | Royal Park | SA | 110 | 3,453 | 3.2% |
| 40 | Port Augusta West | SA | 108 | 4,046 | 2.7% |
| 41 | Two Wells | SA | 107 | 3,233 | 3.3% |
| 42 | Hillcrest | SA | 106 | 3,659 | 2.9% |
| 43 | Holden Hill | SA | 106 | 3,716 | 2.9% |
| 44 | Rosewater | SA | 104 | 3,582 | 2.9% |
| 45 | Evanston Park | SA | 103 | 4,228 | 2.4% |
| 46 | West Lakes Shore | SA | 100 | 3,236 | 3.1% |
| 47 | Elizabeth Park | SA | 99 | 4,428 | 2.2% |
| 48 | Para Hills West | SA | 94 | 3,295 | 2.9% |
| 49 | Elizabeth East | SA | 92 | 4,607 | 2.0% |
| 50 | Pennington | SA | 91 | 3,773 | 2.4% |
| 51 | Virginia | SA | 89 | 2,759 | 3.2% |
| 52 | Woodville Gardens | SA | 87 | 2,412 | 3.6% |
| 53 | Taperoo | SA | 85 | 3,250 | 2.6% |
| 54 | Stirling North | SA | 84 | 2,793 | 3.0% |
| 55 | Bordertown | SA | 83 | 3,095 | 2.7% |
| 56 | Brahma Lodge | SA | 81 | 3,380 | 2.4% |
| 57 | St Marys | SA | 81 | 3,010 | 2.7% |
| 58 | Morphettville | SA | 80 | 3,686 | 2.2% |
| 59 | Willaston | SA | 77 | 3,458 | 2.2% |
| 60 | Freeling | SA | 75 | 2,688 | 2.8% |
| 61 | Elizabeth North | SA | 73 | 3,588 | 2.0% |
| 62 | Elizabeth Vale | SA | 73 | 4,331 | 1.7% |
| 63 | Ottoway | SA | 73 | 2,783 | 2.6% |
| 64 | Ceduna | SA | 71 | 1,955 | 3.6% |
| 65 | Woodville North | SA | 71 | 2,721 | 2.6% |
| 66 | Balaklava | SA | 70 | 2,083 | 3.4% |
| 67 | Osborne | SA | 70 | 1,951 | 3.6% |
| 68 | Para Vista | SA | 70 | 3,023 | 2.3% |
| 69 | Birkenhead | SA | 67 | 1,798 | 3.7% |
| 70 | Beverley | SA | 62 | 1,578 | 3.9% |
| 71 | Cheltenham | SA | 62 | 2,236 | 2.8% |
| 72 | Port Pirie South | SA | 61 | 3,878 | 1.6% |
| 73 | Smithfield Plains | SA | 61 | 3,305 | 1.8% |
| 74 | Salisbury Park | SA | 60 | 2,276 | 2.6% |
| 75 | Evanston Gardens | SA | 58 | 2,347 | 2.5% |
| 76 | Mannum | SA | 58 | 2,919 | 2.0% |
| 77 | Alberton | SA | 55 | 1,860 | 3.0% |
| 78 | Athol Park | SA | 55 | 2,023 | 2.7% |
| 79 | Kadina | SA | 54 | 2,944 | 1.8% |
| 80 | Queenstown | SA | 54 | 1,943 | 2.8% |
| 81 | Albert Park | SA | 49 | 1,780 | 2.8% |
| 82 | Elizabeth South | SA | 49 | 2,933 | 1.7% |
| 83 | Smithfield | SA | 47 | 2,482 | 1.9% |
| 84 | Peterhead | SA | 46 | 1,201 | 3.8% |
| 85 | West Hindmarsh | SA | 45 | 1,560 | 2.9% |
| 86 | Eyre | SA | 44 | 1,113 | 4.0% |
| 87 | Salisbury Plain | SA | 44 | 1,333 | 3.3% |
| 88 | Reynella East | SA | 40 | 1,990 | 2.0% |
| 89 | Ethelton | SA | 39 | 1,487 | 2.6% |
| 90 | Moonta Bay | SA | 39 | 2,633 | 1.5% |
| 91 | Cleve | SA | 38 | 953 | 4.0% |
| 92 | Elizabeth Grove | SA | 38 | 2,531 | 1.5% |
| 93 | Tailem Bend | SA | 38 | 1,705 | 2.2% |
| 94 | Tennyson | SA | 37 | 1,137 | 3.3% |
| 95 | Bedford Park | SA | 36 | 1,882 | 1.9% |
| 96 | Cowandilla | SA | 36 | 1,455 | 2.5% |
| 97 | Mallala | SA | 36 | 1,042 | 3.5% |
| 98 | Risdon Park South | SA | 36 | 2,230 | 1.6% |
| 99 | Angle Park | SA | 35 | 1,555 | 2.3% |
| 100 | Keith | SA | 35 | 1,405 | 2.5% |
Top Suburbs by Transport & Logistics Workers FAQ
-
What does this Transport & Logistics ranking show?
This ranking shows SA suburbs with the highest Transport & Logistics worker counts, based on Census 2021 demographic data.
-
Should I choose a suburb just because it ranks highly here?
No. Demographic rankings explain local context, not investment quality by themselves. Use them with price, rent, income, schools, transport, and detail-page evidence before shortlisting.
-
Why does QuickProperty show count and percentage of population?
The count shows the size of the local group, while the percentage helps avoid overreading large suburbs that rank highly only because they have more residents overall.
-
What is the next step after this demographic ranking?
Open the suburb detail pages for the strongest candidates, save realistic matches to your shortlist, and compare them against affordability and local evidence before making a decision.