What does Best Aged-Care Access rank?

Best Aged-Care Access ranks suburbs in WA using QuickProperty's processed property and locality datasets. Top 50 suburbs by residential aged-care places per 1,000 residents (population > 500). Source: federal aged-care service register

How should I use this ranking for property research?

Use the ranking as a screening step for WA. Save realistic suburbs to your shortlist, compare the strongest two or three, then use suburb detail pages or the calculator to test the final candidate.

Does the top ranked suburb mean it is the best choice?

No. Rankings are a shortlist input, not a final recommendation. Check price history, rent, income, population, local services, source freshness, and current listings before making a decision.

How current is the ranking data?

QuickProperty uses processed public-source datasets and refreshes automated sources where available. Use the suburb detail page source panels to see which signals are current, estimated, or missing for a specific suburb.

← Best Aged-Care Access

Ranking · WA · 50 suburbs

Best Aged-Care Access — WA

Top 50 suburbs by residential aged-care places per 1,000 residents (population > 500). Source: federal aged-care service register in WA.

Leading suburb

CarmelWA

Leading value

159.2

Runner-up

Salter PointWA

Updated

12 July 2026

Ranking

Best Aged-Care Access

Top 50 suburbs by residential aged-care places per 1,000 residents (population > 500). Source: federal aged-care service register — WA

50 results

All NSW VIC QLD WA SA TAS ACT NT

How to read this ranking

Use best aged-care access as a shortlist tool, then verify the finalists in detail.

BEST FOR

Finding which areas deserve a closer look first.

This ranking works best as a first-pass screen in WA, especially when you need to reduce a wide field quickly.

READ IT AS

One signal in the workflow, not the whole answer.

A rank is useful because it compresses one dimension well, but it never replaces the fuller suburb-level picture.

NEXT STEP

Move into compare or suburb detail once a few names repeat.

Use the ranking to build a shortlist, then confirm whether those finalists still hold up on the rest of the data.

VERIFY evidence

Single-signal shortlist screen

A ranking compresses one signal well, but it should hand you into compare or suburb detail before becoming a decision.

SHORTLIST SCREEN

Top candidates are research leads.

Save a small working set, then use compare and evidence depth before treating any row as a decision.

Shortlist flow

Use #1 Carmel and #2 Salter Point as the first compare pair.

Rankings are strongest when they hand you a shortlist quickly. Compare the top two first, then open suburb detail if the head-to-head result still feels narrow.

Compare top 2Open #1 detail Open #2 detail

Distribution

50 suburbs · midpoint ≈ 42.2

Leader: Carmel · 159.2

# ▲	SUBURB	STATE	PLACES / 1K POP	FACILITIES · PLACES	POP
1	Carmel	WA	159.2	1 · 120	754
2	Salter Point	WA	108.1	3 · 315	2,913
3	Murdoch	WA	88.6	2 · 297	3,352
4	Menora	WA	81.8	2 · 220	2,691
5	Myaree	WA	80.8	2 · 170	2,105
6	Bluff Point	WA	80.4	1 · 111	1,381
7	Broadwater	WA	79.9	3 · 341	4,269
8	Guildford	WA	79.4	3 · 162	2,040
9	Jolimont	WA	75.1	1 · 111	1,479
10	Bentley	WA	70.7	9 · 640	9,051
11	South Fremantle	WA	70.0	1 · 238	3,398
12	Lockyer	WA	65.5	1 · 85	1,298
13	Martin	WA	63.6	2 · 118	1,854
14	Calista	WA	62.3	1 · 123	1,975
15	Brookton	WA	58.7	1 · 43	732
16	Kellerberrin	WA	58.2	2 · 51	877
17	Ascot	WA	53.0	1 · 164	3,095
18	Geraldton	WA	52.4	4 · 170	3,246
19	West Perth	WA	52.0	6 · 317	6,102
20	Esperance	WA	50.0	1 · 104	2,080
21	Gwelup	WA	47.7	3 · 257	5,391
22	Greenmount	WA	47.6	1 · 127	2,666
23	Yakamia	WA	45.3	2 · 137	3,025
24	Middle Swan	WA	43.5	1 · 124	2,852
25	Redcliffe	WA	42.5	4 · 214	5,030
26	Embleton	WA	42.2	2 · 152	3,600
27	Shoalwater	WA	38.7	1 · 169	4,368
28	North Coogee	WA	37.2	1 · 139	3,741
29	Spencer Park	WA	36.9	2 · 127	3,445
30	Midland	WA	36.8	4 · 233	6,335
31	Singleton	WA	35.8	1 · 144	4,021
32	Bunbury	WA	34.7	3 · 137	3,948
33	Merriwa	WA	33.8	2 · 189	5,587
34	Como	WA	33.4	4 · 494	14,786
35	Leederville	WA	32.8	1 · 121	3,686
36	Claremont	WA	32.1	3 · 297	9,248
37	Dudley Park	WA	31.6	3 · 220	6,957
38	Inglewood	WA	31.5	2 · 184	5,837
39	Hilton	WA	31.5	1 · 136	4,323
40	Bull Creek	WA	31.3	4 · 251	8,030
41	Roebourne	WA	30.8	2 · 30	975
42	West Leederville	WA	30.6	2 · 133	4,340
43	Meekatharra	WA	30.6	1 · 26	849
44	Rossmoyne	WA	30.2	2 · 110	3,638
45	White Gum Valley	WA	30.1	1 · 101	3,358
46	Willagee	WA	29.4	2 · 160	5,447
47	Ferndale	WA	28.5	1 · 127	4,457
48	Treeby	WA	28.5	1 · 120	4,214
49	Bateman	WA	28.2	1 · 108	3,832
50	North Fremantle	WA	27.9	1 · 110	3,947

FAQ

Australian best aged-care access FAQ

What does Best Aged-Care Access rank?

Best Aged-Care Access ranks suburbs in WA using QuickProperty's processed property and locality datasets. Top 50 suburbs by residential aged-care places per 1,000 residents (population > 500). Source: federal aged-care service register
How should I use this ranking for property research?

Use the ranking as a screening step for WA. Save realistic suburbs to your shortlist, compare the strongest two or three, then use suburb detail pages or the calculator to test the final candidate.
Does the top ranked suburb mean it is the best choice?

No. Rankings are a shortlist input, not a final recommendation. Check price history, rent, income, population, local services, source freshness, and current listings before making a decision.
How current is the ranking data?

QuickProperty uses processed public-source datasets and refreshes automated sources where available. Use the suburb detail page source panels to see which signals are current, estimated, or missing for a specific suburb.