Best Aged-Care Access — ACT
Top 50 suburbs by residential aged-care places per 1,000 residents (population > 500). Source: federal aged-care service register in ACT.
Best Aged-Care Access
Top 50 suburbs by residential aged-care places per 1,000 residents (population > 500). Source: federal aged-care service register — ACT
This ranking works best as a first-pass screen in ACT, especially when you need to reduce a wide field quickly.
A rank is useful because it compresses one dimension well, but it never replaces the fuller suburb-level picture.
Use the ranking to build a shortlist, then confirm whether those finalists still hold up on the rest of the data.
A ranking compresses one signal well, but it should hand you into compare or suburb detail before becoming a decision.
Save a small working set, then use compare and evidence depth before treating any row as a decision.
Rankings are strongest when they hand you a shortlist quickly. Compare the top two first, then open suburb detail if the head-to-head result still feels narrow.
- #1StirlingACT84.92 · 186
- #2PageACT81.53 · 249
- #3FarrerACT55.72 · 211
- #4HughesACT54.81 · 176
- #5WestonACT51.84 · 207
- #6NarrabundahACT36.62 · 236
- #7LynehamACT33.82 · 193
- #8DicksonACT32.81 · 108
- #9GriffithACT30.21 · 161
- #10CalwellACT26.71 · 153
- #11Red HillACT21.61 · 68
- #12MonashACT21.31 · 120
- #13CurtinACT20.71 · 115
- #14GarranACT19.41 · 72
- #15GordonACT15.51 · 122
- #16BruceACT13.31 · 100
- #17BelconnenACT11.81 · 100
- #18KaleenACT10.41 · 80
- #19HoltACT9.41 · 53
- #20CampbellACT6.41 · 42
| # ▲ | SUBURB | STATE | PLACES / 1K POP | FACILITIES · PLACES | POP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stirling | ACT | 84.9 | 2 · 186 | 2,191 |
| 2 | Page | ACT | 81.5 | 3 · 249 | 3,054 |
| 3 | Farrer | ACT | 55.7 | 2 · 211 | 3,787 |
| 4 | Hughes | ACT | 54.8 | 1 · 176 | 3,210 |
| 5 | Weston | ACT | 51.8 | 4 · 207 | 4,000 |
| 6 | Narrabundah | ACT | 36.6 | 2 · 236 | 6,455 |
| 7 | Lyneham | ACT | 33.8 | 2 · 193 | 5,703 |
| 8 | Dickson | ACT | 32.8 | 1 · 108 | 3,292 |
| 9 | Griffith | ACT | 30.2 | 1 · 161 | 5,328 |
| 10 | Calwell | ACT | 26.7 | 1 · 153 | 5,730 |
| 11 | Red Hill | ACT | 21.6 | 1 · 68 | 3,146 |
| 12 | Monash | ACT | 21.3 | 1 · 120 | 5,644 |
| 13 | Curtin | ACT | 20.7 | 1 · 115 | 5,569 |
| 14 | Garran | ACT | 19.4 | 1 · 72 | 3,706 |
| 15 | Gordon | ACT | 15.5 | 1 · 122 | 7,892 |
| 16 | Bruce | ACT | 13.3 | 1 · 100 | 7,520 |
| 17 | Belconnen | ACT | 11.8 | 1 · 100 | 8,502 |
| 18 | Kaleen | ACT | 10.4 | 1 · 80 | 7,672 |
| 19 | Holt | ACT | 9.4 | 1 · 53 | 5,628 |
| 20 | Campbell | ACT | 6.4 | 1 · 42 | 6,564 |
Australian best aged-care access FAQ
-
What does Best Aged-Care Access rank?
Best Aged-Care Access ranks suburbs in ACT using QuickProperty's processed property and locality datasets. Top 50 suburbs by residential aged-care places per 1,000 residents (population > 500). Source: federal aged-care service register
-
How should I use this ranking for property research?
Use the ranking as a screening step for ACT. Save realistic suburbs to your shortlist, compare the strongest two or three, then use suburb detail pages or the calculator to test the final candidate.
-
Does the top ranked suburb mean it is the best choice?
No. Rankings are a shortlist input, not a final recommendation. Check price history, rent, income, population, local services, source freshness, and current listings before making a decision.
-
How current is the ranking data?
QuickProperty uses processed public-source datasets and refreshes automated sources where available. Use the suburb detail page source panels to see which signals are current, estimated, or missing for a specific suburb.