Top Suburbs by Community & Personal Service Workers — NT
NT suburbs with the highest number of Community & Personal Service community & personal service workers, ranked by count from Census 2021.
Top Suburbs by Community & Personal Service Workers
NT suburbs with the highest number of Community & Personal Service community & personal service workers, ranked by count from Census 2021. — NT
This is useful when you want to see where a profession or worker cohort is clustered in NT.
Worker counts reflect concentration and population scale. They should be read alongside housing costs, incomes, and access, not in isolation.
Move into suburb detail if you need to judge whether the area is investable, livable, or simply large enough to dominate a count-based list.
This ranking is backed by demographic counts. It is good for finding clusters, not for deciding suburb quality alone.
Use top rows as research leads, then test affordability, services, and evidence depth before shortlisting.
Rankings are strongest when they hand you a shortlist quickly. Compare the top two first, then open suburb detail if the head-to-head result still feels narrow.
- 769#1Darwin CityNT
- 461#2GillenNT
- 439#3ZuccoliNT
- 393#4LarrakeyahNT
- 364#5RoseberyNT
- 361#6Stuart ParkNT
- 357#7DurackNT
- 343#8MuirheadNT
- 343#9NightcliffNT
- 320#10Katherine EastNT
- 299#11KaramaNT
- 293#12East SideNT
- 288#13HoltzeNT
- 283#14LeanyerNT
- 281#15AraluenNT
- 273#16JohnstonNT
- 268#17BraitlingNT
- 265#18Tennant CreekNT
- 254#19Coconut GroveNT
- 248#20GunnNT
- 247#21SadadeenNT
- 244#22Rapid CreekNT
- 240#23BellamackNT
- 235#24BakewellNT
- 231#25Humpty DooNT
- 226#26MillnerNT
- 226#27WoodroffeNT
- 222#28LyonsNT
- 215#29LarapintaNT
- 208#30DriverNT
- 196#31ParapNT
- 192#32Fannie BayNT
- 192#33GrayNT
- 189#34The GapNT
- 182#35YularaNT
- 179#36Howard SpringsNT
- 178#37MouldenNT
- 171#38NhulunbuyNT
- 166#39MalakNT
- 164#40WulagiNT
- 163#41AnulaNT
- 160#42WagamanNT
- 151#43AlawaNT
- 148#44Desert SpringsNT
- 143#45FarrarNT
- 140#46NakaraNT
- 131#47MoilNT
- 125#48BayviewNT
- 125#49TindalNT
- 122#50TiwiNT
- 120#51Katherine SouthNT
- 119#52VirginiaNT
- 114#53LudmillaNT
- 110#54KatherineNT
- 110#55WanguriNT
- 107#56ManingridaNT
- 105#57WoolnerNT
- 103#58JingiliNT
- 102#59BrinkinNT
- 100#60GirraweenNT
- 95#61GaliwinkuNT
- 88#62BerrimahNT
- 88#63CasuarinaNT
- 86#64MarraraNT
- 78#65HerbertNT
- 73#66Knuckey LagoonNT
- 71#67RossNT
- 68#68CossackNT
- 67#69Mount JohnsNT
- 66#70WadeyeNT
- 60#71JabiruNT
- 57#72The GardensNT
- 56#73WurrumiyangaNT
- 52#74The NarrowsNT
- 51#75Bees CreekNT
- 51#76Santa TeresaNT
- 48#77EatonNT
- 47#78GunbalanyaNT
- 44#79AlyangulaNT
- 42#80YirrkalaNT
- 41#81NgukurrNT
- 39#82BorroloolaNT
- 39#83LajamanuNT
- 37#84CoolalingaNT
- 37#85Marlow LagoonNT
- 36#86StuartNT
- 34#87Berry SpringsNT
- 33#88GapuwiyakNT
- 32#89MilingimbiNT
- 31#90East ArnhemNT
- 31#91Palmerston CityNT
- 30#92Acacia HillsNT
- 29#93YuendumuNT
- 27#94KalkarindjiNT
- 27#95KilgariffNT
- 27#96KintoreNT
- 27#97McMinns LagoonNT
- 26#98AnguruguNT
- 26#99NumbulwarNT
- 25#100Wagait BeachNT
| # ▲ | SUBURB | STATE | COUNT | % OF POP | POP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Darwin City | NT | 769 | 7,149 | 10.8% |
| 2 | Gillen | NT | 461 | 4,466 | 10.3% |
| 3 | Zuccoli | NT | 439 | 4,131 | 10.6% |
| 4 | Larrakeyah | NT | 393 | 3,943 | 10.0% |
| 5 | Rosebery | NT | 364 | 4,127 | 8.8% |
| 6 | Stuart Park | NT | 361 | 4,101 | 8.8% |
| 7 | Durack | NT | 357 | 3,730 | 9.6% |
| 8 | Muirhead | NT | 343 | 3,689 | 9.3% |
| 9 | Nightcliff | NT | 343 | 3,884 | 8.8% |
| 10 | Katherine East | NT | 320 | 3,061 | 10.5% |
| 11 | Karama | NT | 299 | 4,803 | 6.2% |
| 12 | East Side | NT | 293 | 3,098 | 9.5% |
| 13 | Holtze | NT | 288 | 1,940 | 14.8% |
| 14 | Leanyer | NT | 283 | 4,597 | 6.2% |
| 15 | Araluen | NT | 281 | 2,673 | 10.5% |
| 16 | Johnston | NT | 273 | 2,386 | 11.4% |
| 17 | Braitling | NT | 268 | 3,160 | 8.5% |
| 18 | Tennant Creek | NT | 265 | 3,080 | 8.6% |
| 19 | Coconut Grove | NT | 254 | 2,892 | 8.8% |
| 20 | Gunn | NT | 248 | 2,564 | 9.7% |
| 21 | Sadadeen | NT | 247 | 2,307 | 10.7% |
| 22 | Rapid Creek | NT | 244 | 3,261 | 7.5% |
| 23 | Bellamack | NT | 240 | 2,423 | 9.9% |
| 24 | Bakewell | NT | 235 | 3,091 | 7.6% |
| 25 | Humpty Doo | NT | 231 | 4,313 | 5.4% |
| 26 | Millner | NT | 226 | 2,576 | 8.8% |
| 27 | Woodroffe | NT | 226 | 3,175 | 7.1% |
| 28 | Lyons | NT | 222 | 2,219 | 10.0% |
| 29 | Larapinta | NT | 215 | 2,368 | 9.1% |
| 30 | Driver | NT | 208 | 2,747 | 7.6% |
| 31 | Parap | NT | 196 | 2,819 | 7.0% |
| 32 | Fannie Bay | NT | 192 | 2,875 | 6.7% |
| 33 | Gray | NT | 192 | 3,142 | 6.1% |
| 34 | The Gap | NT | 189 | 1,945 | 9.7% |
| 35 | Yulara | NT | 182 | 853 | 21.3% |
| 36 | Howard Springs | NT | 179 | 3,153 | 5.7% |
| 37 | Moulden | NT | 178 | 3,053 | 5.8% |
| 38 | Nhulunbuy | NT | 171 | 3,350 | 5.1% |
| 39 | Malak | NT | 166 | 3,013 | 5.5% |
| 40 | Wulagi | NT | 164 | 2,510 | 6.5% |
| 41 | Anula | NT | 163 | 2,385 | 6.8% |
| 42 | Wagaman | NT | 160 | 2,023 | 7.9% |
| 43 | Alawa | NT | 151 | 2,078 | 7.3% |
| 44 | Desert Springs | NT | 148 | 1,536 | 9.6% |
| 45 | Farrar | NT | 143 | 1,650 | 8.7% |
| 46 | Nakara | NT | 140 | 1,906 | 7.3% |
| 47 | Moil | NT | 131 | 2,000 | 6.6% |
| 48 | Bayview | NT | 125 | 1,702 | 7.3% |
| 49 | Tindal | NT | 125 | 850 | 14.7% |
| 50 | Tiwi | NT | 122 | 2,511 | 4.9% |
| 51 | Katherine South | NT | 120 | 1,507 | 8.0% |
| 52 | Virginia | NT | 119 | 1,811 | 6.6% |
| 53 | Ludmilla | NT | 114 | 1,667 | 6.8% |
| 54 | Katherine | NT | 110 | 1,254 | 8.8% |
| 55 | Wanguri | NT | 110 | 1,836 | 6.0% |
| 56 | Maningrida | NT | 107 | 2,518 | 4.2% |
| 57 | Woolner | NT | 105 | 962 | 10.9% |
| 58 | Jingili | NT | 103 | 1,841 | 5.6% |
| 59 | Brinkin | NT | 102 | 1,117 | 9.1% |
| 60 | Girraween | NT | 100 | 1,668 | 6.0% |
| 61 | Galiwinku | NT | 95 | 2,199 | 4.3% |
| 62 | Berrimah | NT | 88 | 1,199 | 7.3% |
| 63 | Casuarina | NT | 88 | 406 | 21.7% |
| 64 | Marrara | NT | 86 | 1,323 | 6.5% |
| 65 | Herbert | NT | 78 | 1,610 | 4.8% |
| 66 | Knuckey Lagoon | NT | 73 | 498 | 14.7% |
| 67 | Ross | NT | 71 | 806 | 8.8% |
| 68 | Cossack | NT | 68 | 1,293 | 5.3% |
| 69 | Mount Johns | NT | 67 | 541 | 12.4% |
| 70 | Wadeye | NT | 66 | 1,924 | 3.4% |
| 71 | Jabiru | NT | 60 | 755 | 7.9% |
| 72 | The Gardens | NT | 57 | 726 | 7.9% |
| 73 | Wurrumiyanga | NT | 56 | 1,421 | 3.9% |
| 74 | The Narrows | NT | 52 | 632 | 8.2% |
| 75 | Bees Creek | NT | 51 | 803 | 6.4% |
| 76 | Santa Teresa | NT | 51 | 609 | 8.4% |
| 77 | Eaton | NT | 48 | 284 | 16.9% |
| 78 | Gunbalanya | NT | 47 | 1,177 | 4.0% |
| 79 | Alyangula | NT | 44 | 751 | 5.9% |
| 80 | Yirrkala | NT | 42 | 657 | 6.4% |
| 81 | Ngukurr | NT | 41 | 1,088 | 3.8% |
| 82 | Borroloola | NT | 39 | 755 | 5.2% |
| 83 | Lajamanu | NT | 39 | 655 | 6.0% |
| 84 | Coolalinga | NT | 37 | 510 | 7.3% |
| 85 | Marlow Lagoon | NT | 37 | 754 | 4.9% |
| 86 | Stuart | NT | 36 | 459 | 7.8% |
| 87 | Berry Springs | NT | 34 | 870 | 3.9% |
| 88 | Gapuwiyak | NT | 33 | 705 | 4.7% |
| 89 | Milingimbi | NT | 32 | 1,097 | 2.9% |
| 90 | East Arnhem | NT | 31 | 1,194 | 2.6% |
| 91 | Palmerston City | NT | 31 | 194 | 16.0% |
| 92 | Acacia Hills | NT | 30 | 711 | 4.2% |
| 93 | Yuendumu | NT | 29 | 740 | 3.9% |
| 94 | Kalkarindji | NT | 27 | 383 | 7.0% |
| 95 | Kilgariff | NT | 27 | 551 | 4.9% |
| 96 | Kintore | NT | 27 | 420 | 6.4% |
| 97 | McMinns Lagoon | NT | 27 | 687 | 3.9% |
| 98 | Angurugu | NT | 26 | 883 | 2.9% |
| 99 | Numbulwar | NT | 26 | 681 | 3.8% |
| 100 | Wagait Beach | NT | 25 | 422 | 5.9% |
Top Suburbs by Community & Personal Service Workers FAQ
-
What does this Community & Personal Service ranking show?
This ranking shows NT suburbs with the highest Community & Personal Service worker counts, based on Census 2021 demographic data.
-
Should I choose a suburb just because it ranks highly here?
No. Demographic rankings explain local context, not investment quality by themselves. Use them with price, rent, income, schools, transport, and detail-page evidence before shortlisting.
-
Why does QuickProperty show count and percentage of population?
The count shows the size of the local group, while the percentage helps avoid overreading large suburbs that rank highly only because they have more residents overall.
-
What is the next step after this demographic ranking?
Open the suburb detail pages for the strongest candidates, save realistic matches to your shortlist, and compare them against affordability and local evidence before making a decision.