Least Affordable Suburbs (Mortgage) — ACT
Top 50 suburbs by share of median household income needed to service a new mortgage in ACT.
Least Affordable Suburbs (Mortgage)
Top 50 suburbs by share of median household income needed to service a new mortgage — ACT
This list is useful when price is the first constraint and you want a fast screen in ACT.
Low prices can reflect weaker demand, thin markets, low incomes, remote location, or missing amenity coverage. Treat this as a first filter only.
Open the suburb pages or compare tool next so you can see whether a cheap suburb is simply low priced or genuinely competitive.
This list is strongest as a market screen. Use suburb detail to verify rent, services, population, and local context.
Use compare to separate genuinely usable cheap suburbs from places that are cheap because evidence or services are weak.
Rankings are strongest when they hand you a shortlist quickly. Compare the top two first, then open suburb detail if the head-to-head result still feels narrow.
- #1ForrestACT168%28.6x
- #2ReidACT117%19.9x
- #3TurnerACT107%18.1x
- #4GriffithACT97%16.5x
- #5KingstonACT88%15.0x
- #6BraddonACT86%14.6x
- #7YarralumlaACT76%12.9x
- #8AinslieACT70%11.9x
- #9LynehamACT67%11.4x
- #10O'ConnorACT67%11.3x
- #11NarrabundahACT67%11.3x
- #12DeakinACT65%11.1x
- #13O'MalleyACT64%10.9x
- #14LyonsACT64%10.8x
- #15IsaacsACT64%10.8x
- #16BruceACT64%10.8x
- #17CampbellACT64%10.8x
- #18LawsonACT64%10.8x
- #19CookACT63%10.7x
- #20HawkerACT62%10.6x
- #21PearceACT61%10.4x
- #22GarranACT61%10.3x
- #23WrightACT61%10.3x
- #24Red HillACT59%10.0x
- #25HughesACT57%9.8x
- #26DownerACT57%9.8x
- #27StirlingACT57%9.6x
- #28MawsonACT56%9.5x
- #29CurtinACT56%9.5x
- #30MacquarieACT55%9.4x
- #31DicksonACT55%9.4x
- #32PageACT55%9.3x
- #33FarrerACT53%9.0x
- #34FloreyACT52%8.8x
- #35WatsonACT52%8.8x
- #36HackettACT52%8.8x
- #37ArandaACT51%8.7x
- #38GungahlinACT51%8.7x
- #39PalmerstonACT51%8.6x
- #40Denman ProspectACT50%8.4x
- #41ChifleyACT49%8.4x
- #42TaylorACT49%8.3x
- #43KaleenACT49%8.3x
- #44ChapmanACT48%8.1x
- #45HolderACT47%8.0x
- #46BonythonACT47%8.0x
- #47WaramangaACT47%8.0x
- #48MonashACT47%8.0x
- #49FranklinACT47%7.9x
- #50RivettACT47%7.9x
| # ▲ | SUBURB | STATE | % OF INCOME | PRICE/INCOME | POP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Forrest | ACT | 168% | 28.6x | 1,827 |
| 2 | Reid | ACT | 117% | 19.9x | 1,544 |
| 3 | Turner | ACT | 107% | 18.1x | 4,470 |
| 4 | Griffith | ACT | 97% | 16.5x | 5,328 |
| 5 | Kingston | ACT | 88% | 15.0x | 6,579 |
| 6 | Braddon | ACT | 86% | 14.6x | 6,383 |
| 7 | Yarralumla | ACT | 76% | 12.9x | 3,120 |
| 8 | Ainslie | ACT | 70% | 11.9x | 5,376 |
| 9 | Lyneham | ACT | 67% | 11.4x | 5,703 |
| 10 | O'Connor | ACT | 67% | 11.3x | 5,917 |
| 11 | Narrabundah | ACT | 67% | 11.3x | 6,455 |
| 12 | Deakin | ACT | 65% | 11.1x | 3,124 |
| 13 | O'Malley | ACT | 64% | 10.9x | 928 |
| 14 | Lyons | ACT | 64% | 10.8x | 3,271 |
| 15 | Isaacs | ACT | 64% | 10.8x | 2,379 |
| 16 | Bruce | ACT | 64% | 10.8x | 7,520 |
| 17 | Campbell | ACT | 64% | 10.8x | 6,564 |
| 18 | Lawson | ACT | 64% | 10.8x | 2,739 |
| 19 | Cook | ACT | 63% | 10.7x | 2,965 |
| 20 | Hawker | ACT | 62% | 10.6x | 3,008 |
| 21 | Pearce | ACT | 61% | 10.4x | 2,687 |
| 22 | Garran | ACT | 61% | 10.3x | 3,706 |
| 23 | Wright | ACT | 61% | 10.3x | 3,808 |
| 24 | Red Hill | ACT | 59% | 10.0x | 3,146 |
| 25 | Hughes | ACT | 57% | 9.8x | 3,210 |
| 26 | Downer | ACT | 57% | 9.8x | 4,296 |
| 27 | Stirling | ACT | 57% | 9.6x | 2,191 |
| 28 | Mawson | ACT | 56% | 9.5x | 3,440 |
| 29 | Curtin | ACT | 56% | 9.5x | 5,569 |
| 30 | Macquarie | ACT | 55% | 9.4x | 3,104 |
| 31 | Dickson | ACT | 55% | 9.4x | 3,292 |
| 32 | Page | ACT | 55% | 9.3x | 3,054 |
| 33 | Farrer | ACT | 53% | 9.0x | 3,787 |
| 34 | Florey | ACT | 52% | 8.8x | 4,781 |
| 35 | Watson | ACT | 52% | 8.8x | 6,727 |
| 36 | Hackett | ACT | 52% | 8.8x | 3,227 |
| 37 | Aranda | ACT | 51% | 8.7x | 2,605 |
| 38 | Gungahlin | ACT | 51% | 8.7x | 8,586 |
| 39 | Palmerston | ACT | 51% | 8.6x | 5,579 |
| 40 | Denman Prospect | ACT | 50% | 8.4x | 2,759 |
| 41 | Chifley | ACT | 49% | 8.4x | 2,680 |
| 42 | Taylor | ACT | 49% | 8.3x | 2,220 |
| 43 | Kaleen | ACT | 49% | 8.3x | 7,672 |
| 44 | Chapman | ACT | 48% | 8.1x | 2,867 |
| 45 | Holder | ACT | 47% | 8.0x | 2,816 |
| 46 | Bonython | ACT | 47% | 8.0x | 3,839 |
| 47 | Waramanga | ACT | 47% | 8.0x | 2,785 |
| 48 | Monash | ACT | 47% | 8.0x | 5,644 |
| 49 | Franklin | ACT | 47% | 7.9x | 7,484 |
| 50 | Rivett | ACT | 47% | 7.9x | 3,354 |
Australian least affordable suburbs (mortgage) FAQ
-
What does Least Affordable Suburbs (Mortgage) rank?
Least Affordable Suburbs (Mortgage) ranks suburbs in ACT using QuickProperty's processed property and locality datasets. Top 50 suburbs by share of median household income needed to service a new mortgage
-
How should I use this ranking for property research?
Use the ranking as a screening step for ACT. Save realistic suburbs to your shortlist, compare the strongest two or three, then use suburb detail pages or the calculator to test the final candidate.
-
Does the top ranked suburb mean it is the best choice?
No. Rankings are a shortlist input, not a final recommendation. Check price history, rent, income, population, local services, source freshness, and current listings before making a decision.
-
How current is the ranking data?
QuickProperty uses processed public-source datasets and refreshes automated sources where available. Use the suburb detail page source panels to see which signals are current, estimated, or missing for a specific suburb.