Top Suburbs by Public Admin & Safety Workers — ACT
ACT suburbs with the highest number of Public Admin & Safety public admin & safety workers, ranked by count from Census 2021.
Top Suburbs by Public Admin & Safety Workers
ACT suburbs with the highest number of Public Admin & Safety public admin & safety workers, ranked by count from Census 2021. — ACT
This helps when you want a fast read on where one industry is concentrated in ACT.
Employment counts say something about local economic shape, but they do not tell you on their own whether prices, rents, or amenities make the area attractive.
Use the ranking to narrow the field, then verify affordability, demand, schools, and transport before treating the area as a serious candidate.
This ranking is backed by demographic counts. It is good for finding clusters, not for deciding suburb quality alone.
Use top rows as research leads, then test affordability, services, and evidence depth before shortlisting.
Rankings are strongest when they hand you a shortlist quickly. Compare the top two first, then open suburb detail if the head-to-head result still feels narrow.
- 2,412#1CampbellACT
- 2,137#2KambahACT
- 2,038#3KingstonACT
- 1,950#4BraddonACT
- 1,574#5NgunnawalACT
- 1,486#6HarrisonACT
- 1,286#7GordonACT
- 1,253#8GriffithACT
- 1,253#9WatsonACT
- 1,190#10GungahlinACT
- 1,178#11FranklinACT
- 1,165#12WanniassaACT
- 1,164#13TurnerACT
- 1,159#14BelconnenACT
- 1,150#15DunlopACT
- 1,102#16BruceACT
- 1,097#17NichollsACT
- 1,096#18BonnerACT
- 1,082#19CaseyACT
- 1,082#20NarrabundahACT
- 1,064#21AmarooACT
- 1,025#22PhillipACT
- 1,020#23MacgregorACT
- 1,002#24LynehamACT
- 965#25KaleenACT
- 954#26O'ConnorACT
- 947#27ConderACT
- 945#28CurtinACT
- 928#29CalwellACT
- 911#30CraceACT
- 899#31AinslieACT
- 867#32FordeACT
- 860#33MonashACT
- 844#34BanksACT
- 838#35CoombsACT
- 829#36CityACT
- 815#37PalmerstonACT
- 798#38GreenwayACT
- 789#39MoncrieffACT
- 771#40EvattACT
- 765#41DicksonACT
- 752#42ChisholmACT
- 751#43HoltACT
- 743#44WrightACT
- 700#45DownerACT
- 659#46BartonACT
- 640#47BonythonACT
- 623#48FloreyACT
- 623#49TheodoreACT
- 602#50WestonACT
- 601#51Isabella PlainsACT
- 562#52DuffyACT
- 556#53HackettACT
- 554#54FarrerACT
- 529#55Denman ProspectACT
- 527#56FaddenACT
- 526#57FlynnACT
- 523#58LathamACT
- 503#59GarranACT
- 496#60MawsonACT
- 483#61HughesACT
- 482#62HolderACT
- 480#63FisherACT
- 478#64GowrieACT
- 477#65LyonsACT
- 471#66CookACT
- 460#67RivettACT
- 451#68GiralangACT
- 450#69HigginsACT
- 447#70ChifleyACT
- 434#71MacquarieACT
- 428#72WaramangaACT
- 423#73ChapmanACT
- 423#74Red HillACT
- 419#75MelbaACT
- 411#76DeakinACT
- 411#77PearceACT
- 405#78GilmoreACT
- 398#79ScullinACT
- 398#80WeetangeraACT
- 390#81YarralumlaACT
- 385#82ArandaACT
- 382#83LawsonACT
- 379#84HawkerACT
- 370#85McKellarACT
- 368#86ThrosbyACT
- 361#87PageACT
- 361#88TorrensACT
- 360#89IsaacsACT
- 354#90ForrestACT
- 351#91RichardsonACT
- 334#92CharnwoodACT
- 329#93SpenceACT
- 304#94StirlingACT
- 297#95ReidACT
- 275#96FraserACT
- 262#97TaylorACT
- 260#98OxleyACT
- 242#99MacarthurACT
- 110#100O'MalleyACT
| # ▲ | SUBURB | STATE | COUNT | % OF POP | POP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Campbell | ACT | 2,412 | 6,564 | 36.7% |
| 2 | Kambah | ACT | 2,137 | 15,670 | 13.6% |
| 3 | Kingston | ACT | 2,038 | 6,579 | 31.0% |
| 4 | Braddon | ACT | 1,950 | 6,383 | 30.5% |
| 5 | Ngunnawal | ACT | 1,574 | 10,957 | 14.4% |
| 6 | Harrison | ACT | 1,486 | 8,244 | 18.0% |
| 7 | Gordon | ACT | 1,286 | 7,892 | 16.3% |
| 8 | Griffith | ACT | 1,253 | 5,328 | 23.5% |
| 9 | Watson | ACT | 1,253 | 6,727 | 18.6% |
| 10 | Gungahlin | ACT | 1,190 | 8,586 | 13.9% |
| 11 | Franklin | ACT | 1,178 | 7,484 | 15.7% |
| 12 | Wanniassa | ACT | 1,165 | 7,885 | 14.8% |
| 13 | Turner | ACT | 1,164 | 4,470 | 26.0% |
| 14 | Belconnen | ACT | 1,159 | 8,502 | 13.6% |
| 15 | Dunlop | ACT | 1,150 | 7,265 | 15.8% |
| 16 | Bruce | ACT | 1,102 | 7,520 | 14.7% |
| 17 | Nicholls | ACT | 1,097 | 6,680 | 16.4% |
| 18 | Bonner | ACT | 1,096 | 7,339 | 14.9% |
| 19 | Casey | ACT | 1,082 | 6,471 | 16.7% |
| 20 | Narrabundah | ACT | 1,082 | 6,455 | 16.8% |
| 21 | Amaroo | ACT | 1,064 | 6,129 | 17.4% |
| 22 | Phillip | ACT | 1,025 | 5,197 | 19.7% |
| 23 | Macgregor | ACT | 1,020 | 7,049 | 14.5% |
| 24 | Lyneham | ACT | 1,002 | 5,703 | 17.6% |
| 25 | Kaleen | ACT | 965 | 7,672 | 12.6% |
| 26 | O'Connor | ACT | 954 | 5,917 | 16.1% |
| 27 | Conder | ACT | 947 | 5,108 | 18.5% |
| 28 | Curtin | ACT | 945 | 5,569 | 17.0% |
| 29 | Calwell | ACT | 928 | 5,730 | 16.2% |
| 30 | Crace | ACT | 911 | 4,800 | 19.0% |
| 31 | Ainslie | ACT | 899 | 5,376 | 16.7% |
| 32 | Forde | ACT | 867 | 4,435 | 19.5% |
| 33 | Monash | ACT | 860 | 5,644 | 15.2% |
| 34 | Banks | ACT | 844 | 5,100 | 16.5% |
| 35 | Coombs | ACT | 838 | 4,851 | 17.3% |
| 36 | City | ACT | 829 | 4,835 | 17.1% |
| 37 | Palmerston | ACT | 815 | 5,579 | 14.6% |
| 38 | Greenway | ACT | 798 | 4,129 | 19.3% |
| 39 | Moncrieff | ACT | 789 | 5,310 | 14.9% |
| 40 | Evatt | ACT | 771 | 5,531 | 13.9% |
| 41 | Dickson | ACT | 765 | 3,292 | 23.2% |
| 42 | Chisholm | ACT | 752 | 5,268 | 14.3% |
| 43 | Holt | ACT | 751 | 5,628 | 13.3% |
| 44 | Wright | ACT | 743 | 3,808 | 19.5% |
| 45 | Downer | ACT | 700 | 4,296 | 16.3% |
| 46 | Barton | ACT | 659 | 1,946 | 33.9% |
| 47 | Bonython | ACT | 640 | 3,839 | 16.7% |
| 48 | Florey | ACT | 623 | 4,781 | 13.0% |
| 49 | Theodore | ACT | 623 | 3,798 | 16.4% |
| 50 | Weston | ACT | 602 | 4,000 | 15.0% |
| 51 | Isabella Plains | ACT | 601 | 4,329 | 13.9% |
| 52 | Duffy | ACT | 562 | 3,395 | 16.6% |
| 53 | Hackett | ACT | 556 | 3,227 | 17.2% |
| 54 | Farrer | ACT | 554 | 3,787 | 14.6% |
| 55 | Denman Prospect | ACT | 529 | 2,759 | 19.2% |
| 56 | Fadden | ACT | 527 | 3,006 | 17.5% |
| 57 | Flynn | ACT | 526 | 3,671 | 14.3% |
| 58 | Latham | ACT | 523 | 3,767 | 13.9% |
| 59 | Garran | ACT | 503 | 3,706 | 13.6% |
| 60 | Mawson | ACT | 496 | 3,440 | 14.4% |
| 61 | Hughes | ACT | 483 | 3,210 | 15.0% |
| 62 | Holder | ACT | 482 | 2,816 | 17.1% |
| 63 | Fisher | ACT | 480 | 3,219 | 14.9% |
| 64 | Gowrie | ACT | 478 | 3,140 | 15.2% |
| 65 | Lyons | ACT | 477 | 3,271 | 14.6% |
| 66 | Cook | ACT | 471 | 2,965 | 15.9% |
| 67 | Rivett | ACT | 460 | 3,354 | 13.7% |
| 68 | Giralang | ACT | 451 | 3,372 | 13.4% |
| 69 | Higgins | ACT | 450 | 3,321 | 13.6% |
| 70 | Chifley | ACT | 447 | 2,680 | 16.7% |
| 71 | Macquarie | ACT | 434 | 3,104 | 14.0% |
| 72 | Waramanga | ACT | 428 | 2,785 | 15.4% |
| 73 | Chapman | ACT | 423 | 2,867 | 14.8% |
| 74 | Red Hill | ACT | 423 | 3,146 | 13.4% |
| 75 | Melba | ACT | 419 | 3,383 | 12.4% |
| 76 | Deakin | ACT | 411 | 3,124 | 13.2% |
| 77 | Pearce | ACT | 411 | 2,687 | 15.3% |
| 78 | Gilmore | ACT | 405 | 2,706 | 15.0% |
| 79 | Scullin | ACT | 398 | 3,069 | 13.0% |
| 80 | Weetangera | ACT | 398 | 2,795 | 14.2% |
| 81 | Yarralumla | ACT | 390 | 3,120 | 12.5% |
| 82 | Aranda | ACT | 385 | 2,605 | 14.8% |
| 83 | Lawson | ACT | 382 | 2,739 | 13.9% |
| 84 | Hawker | ACT | 379 | 3,008 | 12.6% |
| 85 | McKellar | ACT | 370 | 2,740 | 13.5% |
| 86 | Throsby | ACT | 368 | 2,405 | 15.3% |
| 87 | Page | ACT | 361 | 3,054 | 11.8% |
| 88 | Torrens | ACT | 361 | 2,424 | 14.9% |
| 89 | Isaacs | ACT | 360 | 2,379 | 15.1% |
| 90 | Forrest | ACT | 354 | 1,827 | 19.4% |
| 91 | Richardson | ACT | 351 | 3,058 | 11.5% |
| 92 | Charnwood | ACT | 334 | 3,055 | 10.9% |
| 93 | Spence | ACT | 329 | 2,587 | 12.7% |
| 94 | Stirling | ACT | 304 | 2,191 | 13.9% |
| 95 | Reid | ACT | 297 | 1,544 | 19.2% |
| 96 | Fraser | ACT | 275 | 2,126 | 12.9% |
| 97 | Taylor | ACT | 262 | 2,220 | 11.8% |
| 98 | Oxley | ACT | 260 | 1,703 | 15.3% |
| 99 | Macarthur | ACT | 242 | 1,405 | 17.2% |
| 100 | O'Malley | ACT | 110 | 928 | 11.9% |
Top Suburbs by Public Admin & Safety Workers FAQ
-
What does this Public Admin & Safety ranking show?
This ranking shows ACT suburbs with the highest Public Admin & Safety worker counts, based on Census 2021 demographic data.
-
Should I choose a suburb just because it ranks highly here?
No. Demographic rankings explain local context, not investment quality by themselves. Use them with price, rent, income, schools, transport, and detail-page evidence before shortlisting.
-
Why does QuickProperty show count and percentage of population?
The count shows the size of the local group, while the percentage helps avoid overreading large suburbs that rank highly only because they have more residents overall.
-
What is the next step after this demographic ranking?
Open the suburb detail pages for the strongest candidates, save realistic matches to your shortlist, and compare them against affordability and local evidence before making a decision.